By CIJ
KUALA LUMPUR, Malaysia--Centre for Independent Journalism (CIJ) is appalled and disappointed by the Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission (MACC) chief commissioner Tan Sri Azam Baki’s defamation suit against a journalist, Lalitha Kunaratnam.
This move by Azam Baki is seen as a form of intimidation and reprisal against a journalist, who in good faith provided evidence and research-based news articles on a matter of public interest.
This defamation suit further calls into question the role of Azam Baki, as a public official, who in his own professional capacity should be working towards the elimination of corruption in the country and upholding the media’s rights to report on news related to said matters.
It is the media’s role to investigate and report on matters that would impact the trust and credibility of public institutions as necessary means of ensuring transparency and holding them accountable.
It is the media’s role to investigate and report on matters that would impact the trust and credibility of public institutions as necessary means of ensuring transparency and holding them accountable.
Initiating litigation against the media is akin to denying the public’s right to know and access information that would enable them to make informed decisions and form opinions.
This form of retaliatory lawsuit is used to deter the freedom of expression and speech by intimidating watchdogs and critics, such as the media or activists who safeguard our democracy; and financially drain their resources.
The use of retaliatory lawsuits against an independent journalist is concerning when many of them bring attention to complex issues or scandals. In many instances, these journalists do not have the financial means and legal support. It creates a worrying precedent where journalists are forced to operate within a climate of fear.
The government should be proactive in responding to allegations and claims highlighted by the media, and ensure that its laws and mechanisms are not (mis)used to restrict and punish the media for doing its critical reporting job.
Investigative reports are an integral part of freedom of expression and the right to information. The media add another layer as whistleblowers. Protection of whistleblowers is also essential as its safeguards public interest and promotes a culture of public accountability and integrity.
We stand by Lalitha and other journalists who have been harassed and targeted for simply performing their duty to provide fact-based reports that raised a legitimate question in the public’s interests. We also demand better protection and support for their efforts in uncovering alleged corruption and controversies.
To that end, we call on the following recommendations to be adopted at once:
a)Azam Baki must, without any delay, withdraw the defamation suit and stop the harassment against the journalist;
b)The State to guarantee a safe and enabling environment for media by reviewing and amending defamation laws that are often used as retaliation and harassment against the media reports which are critical of public institutions or individuals holding public office;
c)The Whistleblowers Act 2010 must be reviewed and its scope of protection expanded and strengthened with no further delays;
d)Move ahead with the establishment of the Malaysian Media Council as a transparent and independent self-regulatory body for the industry and to avoid the government and its agencies from becoming the sole arbiter of truth;
e)Investigate the allegations against Azam Baki and uphold the integrity of the MACC and the State.
The use of retaliatory lawsuits against an independent journalist is concerning when many of them bring attention to complex issues or scandals. In many instances, these journalists do not have the financial means and legal support. It creates a worrying precedent where journalists are forced to operate within a climate of fear.
The government should be proactive in responding to allegations and claims highlighted by the media, and ensure that its laws and mechanisms are not (mis)used to restrict and punish the media for doing its critical reporting job.
Investigative reports are an integral part of freedom of expression and the right to information. The media add another layer as whistleblowers. Protection of whistleblowers is also essential as its safeguards public interest and promotes a culture of public accountability and integrity.
We stand by Lalitha and other journalists who have been harassed and targeted for simply performing their duty to provide fact-based reports that raised a legitimate question in the public’s interests. We also demand better protection and support for their efforts in uncovering alleged corruption and controversies.
To that end, we call on the following recommendations to be adopted at once:
a)Azam Baki must, without any delay, withdraw the defamation suit and stop the harassment against the journalist;
b)The State to guarantee a safe and enabling environment for media by reviewing and amending defamation laws that are often used as retaliation and harassment against the media reports which are critical of public institutions or individuals holding public office;
c)The Whistleblowers Act 2010 must be reviewed and its scope of protection expanded and strengthened with no further delays;
d)Move ahead with the establishment of the Malaysian Media Council as a transparent and independent self-regulatory body for the industry and to avoid the government and its agencies from becoming the sole arbiter of truth;
e)Investigate the allegations against Azam Baki and uphold the integrity of the MACC and the State.
Please share and forward to all friends We would like to inform everyone about YIP KUM FOOK, president of SAMNAK SAMBODHI BUDDHIST TEMPLE, Taman Desa Jaya, Kepong, YIP KUM FOOK has never embarrassed people about him always lying, cheating, insulting Buddhist teachings, etc. Recently, many people talked about his character, before this he was a truck driver who sent furniture everywhere, then he studied law courses at several universities but we did not know he study courses or not because he did not know the law, he cheated people everywhere. and how lawyers can deceive people without fear of the law Hope everyone should care about this name YIP KUM FOOK (LAWYER OR MCA GOMBAK CHAIRMAN AND PRESIDENT OF SAMNAK SAMBODHI BUDDHIST TEMPLE), also need to share and forward to all. If you make a mistake, you will lose everything, this man or YIP KUM FOOK is very dangerous and his son (YIP JIUN HANN) is also the most dangerous. By KOK MENG, KEPONG Sila kongsi dan majukan kepada semua rakan-rakan Kami ingin memaklumkan kepada semua tentang YIP KUM FOOK, presiden KUIL BUDDHA SAMNAK SAMBODHI, Taman Desa Jaya, Kepong, YIP KUM FOOK tidak pernah memalukan orang ramai tentang beliau selalu berbohong, menipu, menghina ajaran Buddha, dll. Baru-baru ini ramai yang memperkatakan tentang perwatakannya, sebelum ini dia seorang pemandu lori yang menghantar perabot ke mana-mana, kemudian dia belajar kursus undang-undang di beberapa universiti tetapi kita tidak tahu dia belajar kursus atau tidak kerana dia tidak tahu undang-undang, dia menipu orang. dimana - mana. dan bagaimana peguam boleh menipu orang tanpa rasa takut pada undang-undang Harap semua orang harus mengambil berat tentang nama ini YIP KUM FOOK (PEGUAM ATAU MCA GOMBAK PENGERUSI DAN PRESIDEN KUIL BUDDHA SAMNAK SAMBODHI), juga perlu dikongsi dan dimajukan kepada semua. Jika tersilap langkah, anda akan kehilangan segala-galanya, lelaki atau YIP KUM FOOK ini sangat bahaya dan anaknya (YIP JIUN HANN) juga yang paling bahaya. Oleh KOK MENG, KEPONG