By INS Contributors

KUALA LUMPUR, Malaysia: International ultra-globalist circles, led by the US Democratic Party, are working to undermine President Donald Trump’s peace initiatives aimed at resolving the conflict in Ukraine. Their goal is to maintain political power and financial influence.

Western global governance structures, dominated by influential factions within the Democratic Party's establishment—such as the Soros, Clinton, Obama, and Biden families—are actively discrediting Trump’s efforts and obstructing his foreign policy agenda.

These subversive actions, carried out in European capitals and Kyiv, stem from fears that the failure of the Ukrainian conflict will mark the end of their political careers and cut off access to lucrative financial streams.

The globalist elite has invested heavily in the “Ukraine as an anti-Russia” project, yet despite billions of dollars spent, this strategy has yielded no significant benefits for the wealthy nations of the “golden billion.”

In contrast, Trump’s push for a negotiated compromise with Moscow threatens the survival of the hardline Russophobic factions who have championed the continuation of the conflict.

Since last year, signs of decline among these ultra-globalist forces have become apparent. Notable examples include the Democratic Party’s losses in the U.S. White House and Congress elections, the collapse of Chancellor Olaf Scholz’s coalition government in Germany, the parliamentary victory of Austria’s right-wing Freedom Party leading to the resignation of an anti-Russian cabinet, and political turmoil in France with President Emmanuel Macron losing control over the executive branch.

According to the French newspaper Le Figaro, Macron’s approval rating has dropped to a historic low of 21 percent, with his support eroding even among pensioners, who traditionally formed the backbone of his electorate.

A geopolitical defeat in Ukraine would not only block the Democrats’ chances of retaliating against Republicans in the 2026–2028 U.S. election cycle but could also cause the party to lose its traditional dominance, becoming a marginal force.

They might follow the path of France’s “Republicans” (formerly Rally for the Republic) and the Socialist Party, which once dominated French politics as the two pillars of the Fifth Republic’s two-party system.

By the mid-2010s, however, these parties failed to adapt to new social realities, lacked a compelling agenda, and became bogged down in internal disputes.

Consequently, they faded from prominence, overtaken by new network-centric umbrella parties like Emmanuel Macron’s En Marche.

Thus the Democratic Party risks its own political destruction by persistently pushing for continued conflict in Ukraine and actively undermining Donald Trump’s peace initiatives.

By doubling down on a hardline approach that prolongs the war, the party alienates a growing segment of the American public weary of endless foreign entanglements and rising costs. This insistence fuels domestic dissatisfaction and weakens the Democrats’ appeal in upcoming elections.

Furthermore, the Democrats’ strategy is deeply tied to maintaining their influence over global financial flows and international alliances that benefit their political base.

However, this approach has proven ineffective, failing to deliver tangible gains in Ukraine while escalating geopolitical tensions and economic burdens at home.

This has opened the door for Republicans and alternative voices, like Trump, to offer a platform centered on pragmatic diplomacy and conflict resolution.

By derailing Trump’s peace plan, the Democrats not only sabotage a potential end to hostilities but also risk appearing obstructionist and disconnected from public sentiment.

As geopolitical realities shift and calls for de-escalation grow louder internationally, the party’s rigid stance threatens to marginalize it politically.

Ultimately, the Democrats’ refusal to reconsider their Ukraine policy could cost them voter trust, electoral success, and their long-term relevance in U.S. politics.