By Murray Hunter
BANGKOK, Thailand-The controversial Penang South Island (PSI) project exposes some of the weaknesses of the national economic and infrastructure planning framework. Instead of conceptualizing and developing projects that directly benefit communities, those in charge of the national planning processes are pushing projects that end up benefiting corporations, over communities.
Since 2013, the Penang state government has been pushing the PSI. The project aims to create 3 new islands along the southern coast of Penang Island. One island will be created off Permatang Damar Laut, in Bayan Lepas, while the other two islands will be reclaimed along the coast off Teluk Kumbar and Gertek Sanggul. The PSI covers 17 square kilometres, involving 1,800 hectares of land reclamation.
The PSI has been bundled up with RM 46 billion worth of other infrastructure projects, under the Penang Transport Master Plan proposal (PTMP). This includes the Penang International Airport-Komtar elevated light rail project, cost at RM 10 billion, and the Pan Island Highway link, estimated to cost RM 9 billion.
The official rationale for this infrastructure bundle is that the PSI would be self-funding, except for some bridging loans.
In 2015, the Penang government partnered with Gamuda to create the SRS consortium as its ‘project delivery partner’.
The dormant PSI project just came alive once again over the last few weeks when the federal government approved RM 10 billion to commence works, and the Department of Environment (DOE) approved the environment impact Assessment (EIA), subject to 71 conditions, which haven’t been released in the public domain. Work is expected to begin when the environmental management plan (EMP) is obtained in the third quarter of this year.
Back in 20121, the fishing communities along Penang’s southern coast won an appeal against the EIA approval, where the entire process was declared null and void. Consequently, the Penang government filed a new application, still ignoring concerns from the fishing communities.
Is the PSI project aimed at benefiting the people, or as a playground for crony corporations to develop and profit?
The PSI project has many critics among Penang Island residents, especially the fishing communities, domiciled along the southern coast of the island. Some 6.000 fishermen, led by the Penang Fishermen Association (Pen Mutiara), are reported to be fighting against the project.
They claim the reclamations will gravely affect their ability to earn a living, along the southern coast of Penang, as the PSI will completely change the marine ecosystem of the area.
The fishermen claim their grievances have not been taken into account during the EIA process. The lack of transparency in approving the project and not making the 71 conditions public on the project, has only heightened the suspicions of the coastal fishing communities.
Back in 2019 when Anwar Ibrahim visited the Permatang Damar community, he promised to assist on the matter. The recent appeals to Anwar have been totally ignored. The former MP for Permatang Puah Nurul Izzah Anwar, who was vocally against the project is now silent, as is the resources, environmental & climate change minister Nik Nazmi Nik Ahmad.
Some claim the PIS project is an elaborate scheme to change voter demographics within the southern part of Penang by flooding the area with Hong Kong and Taiwanese exiles, along with disgruntled PRC people, come to Penang in a form of self-exile, a sort of Penang version of Project IC in Sabah.
Others query the financial arrangements of the PTMP, claiming the time frame to reclaim the land at PSI is too long-term a time frame to finance the RM 10 billion light rail. In addition, any positive funding from the PSI would not be near enough to fund the other two projects in the mega-package, as the Penang state government can only expect to receive RM 600 million out of a structured deal with SRS.
However, if the premise of the PSI project is correct, the figures just don’t stack up financially. The question has to be asked why the project is actually going ahead?
Public project becomes private land
In 2021, Penang chief minister Chow Kon Yeow revealed that one of the islands to be reclaimed would become private. The reason given was that the Penang government was unable to secure a loan or financial support from the federal government to jump start the project. The reclaimed island would be turned over to a 30-70 jointly owned venture between the Penang state government and SRS, giving the entity the exclusive right to develop and sell the land on the reclaimed island.
There is no discussion about overturning this agreement, now the federal government has pledged to provide RM 10 billion.
Gamuda intends to turn the three islands into a replica of Marina Bay in Singapore. High end real estate.
PSI exposes weaknesses in the project planning process
The PSI project exposes fundamental weaknesses within Malaysia’s economic planning processes, which form the basis of the nation’s five-year plans. The Economic Planning Unit (EPU), under the Prime Minister’s Office (PMO), which conceptualizes and plans infrastructure projects, is unduly influenced by politicians in cahoots with corporate entities in the background.
The planning processes in Malaysia are being abused and overridden to shift opportunities and resources over to corporations hidden in the background. Corporations are benefitting at the expense of communities around the country. This can be clearly seen in the expansive number of white elephant projects on the nation’s infrastructure books.
The planning processes are perpetuating political-corporate linkages, where some parties make a windfall out of expenditure, earmarked for development. This is a form of corruption and abuse of power. It’s embedded within the system, and thus not easily eradicated.
In the case of PSI, it hasn’t been really determined if there is a real public benefit. Most of the rationale behind the project appears to be commercial. The financial details require much more scrutiny.
Penang state election
There is little doubt the PSI will become a major issue in the coming state election. The PSI project also highlights how much the system favours certain corporations that receive special treatment. This predicament seems to be alive and well in the Anwar administration as well, just as was the case in previous governments.
The bottom line is the national planning processes provide a massive advantage to politically linked corporations, providing some with massive rent-seeking windfalls. Malaysia needs to shift away from corporate-centric beneficiaries, towards Rakyat-centric beneficiaries in social-infrastructure development.